The most striking point to me this
week was Thrift’s mention of technological prosthesis as fundamental to the
condition of qualcation. Though it is fairly mundane to observe that there are
categories of haves and have-nots, I wonder what role that prosthesis play in
the relationship of networks, especially in the case of a person with
prosthesis attempting to connect with a prosthesis have-not?
Weak ties can be more useful in
accomplishing a goal, like getting a new job, and ultimately work to widen the
reach of a dense, deep group of connections. Put simply, weak ties can connect
smaller networks, resulting in a larger variably dense network itself. But how
could the rise of technology, and these prosthesis that affect people’s
cognitive condition, ultimately limit the possibility of weak connection?
In Sleep Dealer, Memo’s father
lacks the imagined literal prosthesis, nodes, and is fatally misunderstood by
those within the network. While Memo had triggered the alarm, his father was
interchangeable as a person outside of the network. It is only once Memo
becomes a part of the web, given nodes and representation within the network by
Luz, that he can connect with Rudy. The tie between Rudy and Memo is still a
weak one, but still exists within the same system. What does it mean for the
ability to connect if prosthesis so determine our understanding of reality that
linking between someone within the network and someone outside of it is
unimaginable?
No comments:
Post a Comment