Terranova opened
up too many new lands for me so I’ll keep to the fringe. Her introduction of duration as the fundamental value/force/condition
left out of information theory that encapsulates the capacity for constitution
change was an important hinge for me. She takes from Bergson that, “we can
therefore say that movement relates the objects of a closed system to open
duration, and duration to the object of the system, which it forces to open up”
(52). I gather that objects of a closed system are closed off by their physical
mooring and are therefore constitutionally stagnant until opened up to gesture.
This formulation is also applicable to the active processes involved in a
subject’s perception and observation of object– which does refer back to the
basis of communication, mere contact. I’m reminded of a quote I put on my
(almost defunct) photo blog -- “We
have to remember that what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed
to our methods of questioning” Werner Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy, 1958.
It similarly expresses this slippage of construction referring not to
representation/reproduction but production (though relevant to the medium photography
in terms of framing, re-contextualization, etc). Therefore there is this latent
capacity for (productive) far-reaching change (in terms of distance and
ideological facets) enabled through every reproducible relay or analysis. Right? What am I changing by publishing this post? Probably just the available nodes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment